People's Stories Freedom

View previous stories


South Asia is home to over 40 percent of the world’s poor
by South Asia Alliance for Poverty Eradication
Pakistan
 
March, 2014
 
South Asia is home to over 40 percent of the world’s poor. Of the eight countries in the region, four fall in the category of the UN-defined least developed countries. Three of them are landlocked. The share of distribution of GDP among the South Asian countries indicates that there is a lack of symmetrical distribution.
 
These observations were made at the launching ceremony of a South Asia report “Crises, Vulnerability and Poverty in South Asia – People’s Struggles for Justice and Dignity” on Wednesday.
 
The ceremony was organised by the South Asia Alliance for Poverty Eradication (SAAPE) and the Pakistan Institute of Labour Education and Research (Piler) at the Karachi Press Club.
 
Speaking on the occasion, Justice (retd) Majida Razvi appreciated the contents of the report and said it was an important reference material. She said women were the most vulnerable sections of the society affected by poverty.
 
Dr Riaz Shaikh said it was a pity that the people of South Asia were suffering from starvation despite the fact that the area was once famous for provision of food to the entire world. “All this is happening because of neo-liberal policies of globalisation,” he said.
 
“The governments of South Asian countries are not spending much on development.” Zulfiqar Shah said women and children in South Asia were the ones most affected by the poverty. He regretted that despite the large population of poor in South Asia, the expenditure on development in the region was very low. “These countries spent the bulk of their budgets on purchasing weapons. These countries are poor, but their military spending is much more than that of developed countries.”
 
SAAPE is a regional platform of civil society organisations, social movements and people’s networks fighting together against the structural causes of poverty and social injustices in the region and beyond. SAAPE has been compiling the South Asia poverty report since 2003, focusing on the socio-economic development of the region and people’s vulnerability and states’ responses. The current report is the fourth in the series of SAAPE’s publication on poverty analysis and alternative development paradigms.
 
SAAPE launched its 2013 report with a broader analysis of the dominant development paradigm in the South Asian region, highlighting its market-centric nature and growth-led (not equity) development, guided by the harmful principles enshrined in the texts of the Washington Consensus and World Trade Organisation, the International Financial Institution and other instruments created for the suppression of the toiling masses in South Asia.
 
The Human Development Report of 2013 confirms that in most South Asian countries, the score in terms of the HDI is very low. Of the 187 countries, Norway ranks first while Niger ranks last. Although Sri Lanka and the Maldives are comparatively better, South Asia as a region is still in an “inhumane” state in terms of access to income, health and education which is essential for a decent living as per the international standards.
 
The majority of the South Asian population is suffering from destitution, deprivation and misery. The latest multi-dimensional poverty estimates show that poverty continues to be very high in most South Asian countries. In terms of percentage, it is estimated at 57.8, 53.7, 49.4 and 44.2 percent for Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Nepal, respectively.
 
The Maldives and Sri Lanka have low poverty levels at 5.2 and 5.3 percent, respectively. The same measurements also depict the grave intensity of deprivation in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and Nepal, hovering around 50 percent. Likewise, the poverty intensity is high in Bhutan at 43.9 percent.
 
Despite the oppressive forms of political and economic systems existing in South Asian states, the diverse forms of rights movements in the form of resistance movements are increasing. People’s struggle against the forces of suppression, exploitation and marginalisation is becoming more and more purposeful, igniting the hope that these anti-people forces will soon be crippled.
 
The report features the voices of people against the injustice and indignity caused by the crisis-led vulnerability and poverty across the sub-continent and suggests sustainable alternatives. Thus, the report provides a critical review of the broad economic policy regime adopted by the South Asian states as well as the actors and factors influencing or dictating them.
 
http://www.saape.org/index.php/news-room/news/29-saape-s-south-asia-poverty-report-2013-launched-in-karachi-pakistan


 


Global Civics
by Jian Yi and Hakan Altinay
Global Policy Journal
 
Global civics suggests that to understand civics in a global sense as a social contract between the world citizens in the age of interdependence and interaction.
 
The disseminators of the concept define it as the notion that we have certain rights and responsibilities towards each other by the mere fact of being human on Earth.
 
The advocates of the notion attempt to demonstrate that it is possible to imagine global civics. According to this attempt, in an increasingly interdependent world, the world"s citizens need a compass that can frame their mindsets, and create a shared consciousness and sense of global responsibility against to tackle world issues such as the financial crisis, climate change and nuclear proliferation.
 
However, many argue that we must begin by asking several fundamental questions:
 
How will we navigate our increasing global interdependence? Can we conceive a global civics which is both feasible and sufficient to the task?
 
To begin to answer these questions, the above documentary Global Civics, co-produced by Jian Yi and Hakan Altinay, pursues conversations in nine countries; Argentina, Brazil, China, Germany, India, Italy, Turkey, South Africa, and the United States.
 
In this journey, we witness disagreements among two workers in South Africa, as well as consensus between two businessmen in China and Turkey, Buddhist and Muslim theologians, students in India and United States.
 
Global Civics aims to leave you with a dose of hope and a refreshed curiosity for a truly global conversation.
 
http://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/videos/global-civics http://www.publicseminar.org/


Visit the related web page
 

View more stories

Submit a Story Search by keyword and country Guestbook