View previous stories
	Austerity: Bad news for economic recovery and human rights by Samantha LeMaster Center of Concern, Righting Finance   August 27, 2014   Over the last year, reports from Oxfam, the Council of Europe, and the ILO have criticized the implementation of austerity policies both in Europe and worldwide. According to these reports, austerity policies have not only prevented countries from recovering from the financial crisis of 2008, but have also caused states to regress on their human rights obligations.   According to Oxfam, while austerity primarily necessitates budget cuts that deeply reduce spending on social services, policies may also include the privatization of public services such as healthcare, energy, and water, decreased regulation of labor markets, weakening of collective bargaining, increased administration of the regressive Value Added Tax, and a reduction in resources for battling inequality. These policies weakened regulation and decreased public spending with the intention of lowering the deficit-to-GDP and debt-to-GDP ratios and supposedly creating a more growth and investment-friendly environment.   In this misguided attempt to restore the economies in Europe to pre-crisis levels, austerity policies have had serious negative consequences on the realization of human rights. Because of cuts to social spending, the capacities for states to fulfill their human rights obligations have significantly declined, compounding the negative effects of the crisis on poor and vulnerable populations. Austerity has led to retrogressions in education and health, and escalations of discrimination, xenophobia, racism, and scapegoating of minorities. It has furthered poverty and unemployment, especially in relation to children and youth. According to the Council of Europe, homelessness has increased in 15 of its 21 member countries. The employed are suffering too: 10 percent of working households are now living in poverty as a result of declining real wage values, and the disruption of collective bargaining practices has diminished prospects for wage growth. The Council of Europe also predicts spikes in child labor, human trafficking, and food insecurity as a result of these policies.   “We have been here before – Oxfam’s experience of austerity and economic crisis is that it can take 25 years for living standards to recover,” remarks Oxfam International representative Nicolas Mombrial. Should these policies continue, Oxfam’s report also warns of a “lost decade” in Europe and 15 -25 million more Europeans living in poverty by 2025.   Austerity does not only harm European countries: according to the Council of Europe’s report, austerity practices affect between 80 and 90 percent of the world’s population. In the years since the crisis, many developing countries have adopted or opted to continue austerity policies. Additionally, official development assistance to developing nations has been widely cut as part of austerity policies in Europe; this is especially significant since the European Union is the largest provider of ODA worldwide. As a result, social services/protections in developing nations are losing funding at both the national and international levels, severely reducing states’ abilities to respect human rights obligations and undermining efforts to achieve long-term development goals (e.g. the Millennium Development Goals).   The United Nations Human Rights Council, in its Report on the 10th Special Session in 2009, stated: “global economic and financial crises do not diminish the responsibility of national authorities and the international community in the realization of human rights.” In other words, financial crises do not excuse states from their human rights obligations to both their citizens and to people worldwide. Therefore, by adopting and sustaining austerity measures, states have unjustifiably neglected their interior and extraterritorial human rights obligations.   Unfortunately, these measures have also failed to meet their own goals: Oxfam reported that a majority of affected European countries saw increases to their debt-to-GDP ratios, and some even suffered from higher deficits than before austerity policies were implemented. Furthermore, these countries are experiencing weak growth, which Oxfam believes is unlikely to strengthen under the current policies.   This is not surprising, as austerity policies mirror the failed structural adjustment programs of the 80s and 90s. Those programs pushed income per person levels back 15-25 years in some countries and plunged millions into poverty with little to no progress towards economic recovery. Countries were only able to recover after abandoning the IMF-recommended adjustment policies.   In fact, studies show that social protection programs, which austerity measures have worked to undermine, are essential for recovery, as they lead to economic growth, higher levels of productivity, political stability, and declining levels of poverty.   So why are governments worldwide continuing policies that both impair restoration of their economies and cripple efforts to protect human rights?   One possibility is the involvement of international economic institutions, such as the IMF and World Bank. Despite admitting to underestimating to what extent growth would diminish due to austerity measures, these institutions have continuously pushed for implementation and preservation of these harmful policies.   Another possibility comes from austerity’s effect on equality. While the poor have, in some cases, become poorer, the rich have become richer. Oxfam asserts that the richest 10 percent in Europe have seen their share total income grow since the crisis, often in tandem with a decrease in share of total income held by the poorest 10 percent. The luxury goods market is growing, another mark of continuing prosperity for the richest. Rising inequality is dangerous: it is linked to higher crime rates, lower educational outcomes, and decreased trust between people. Likewise, it leaves an opening for another crash: high levels of inequality can lead to more high-risk-high-interest borrowing, one of the causes of the 2008 crisis. It may also be responsible for the continuation of these policies: Oxfam argues that greater inequality gives richer individuals more political power, which they may use to continue these unequal policies.   No matter what the cause, austerity measures are counterintuitive for both the realization of human rights and the restoration of European economies. As such, these policies need to be reversed in order to return Europe to pre-crisis levels socially, economically, and financially, and to hinder dangerous trends worldwide. To do so, Oxfam recommends protecting ODA and social services, restructuring or canceling unsustainable debt, building fair tax systems, and fixing the problems that started the financial crisis.   The Council of Europe adds on to these recommendations, arguing for positive measures to protect vulnerable and marginalized populations, ensuring universal social protection floors, re-strengthening labor regulation and collective bargaining, and supporting other countries economically with human rights-related programs. In order for the world to move forward, human rights must be prioritized, and austerity be left behind.   * Access the link below to read the Oxfam, Council of Europe and ILO cited reports. Visit the related web page
	A tale of the twentieth century, from Stalin to Barbie by Eduardo Galeano Uruguay   Stalin   He learned to write in the language of Georgia, his homeland, but in the seminary the monks made him speak Russian.   Years later in Moscow, his south Caucasus accent still gave him away.   So he decided to become more Russian than the Russians. Was not Napoleon, who hailed from Corsica, more French than the French? And was not Catherine the Great, who was German, more Russian than the Russians?   The Georgian, Iosif Dzhugashvili, chose a Russian name. He called himself Stalin, which means “steel.”   The man of steel expected his son to be made of steel too: from childhood, Stalin’s son Yakov was tempered in fire and ice and shaped by hammer blows.   It did not work. He was his mother’s child. At the age of 19, Yakov wanted no more of it, could bear no more.   He pulled the trigger.   The gunshot did not kill him.   He awoke in the hospital. At the foot of the bed, his father commented:   “You can’t even get that right.”   The Ages of Josephine   At nine years old, she works cleaning houses in St. Louis on the banks of the Mississippi.   At 10, she starts dancing for coins in the street. At 13, she marries.   At 15, once again. Of the first husband she retains not even a bad memory. Of the second, his last name, because she likes how it sounds.   At 17, Josephine Baker dances the Charleston on Broadway. At 18, she crosses the Atlantic and conquers Paris. The “Bronze Venus” performs in the nude, with no more clothing than a belt of bananas.   At 21, her outlandish combination of clown and femme fatale makes her the most popular and highest-paid performer in Europe.   At 24, she is the most photographed woman on the planet. Pablo Picasso, on his knees, paints her. To look like her, the pallid young damsels of Paris rub themselves with walnut cream, which darkens the skin.   At 30, she has problems in some hotels because she travels with a chimpanzee, a snake, a goat, two parrots, several fish, three cats, seven dogs, a cheetah named Chiquita who wears a diamond-studded collar, and a little pig named Albert, whom she bathes in Je Reviens perfume by Worth.   At 40, she receives the Legion of Honor for service to the French Resistance during the Nazi occupation.   At 41 and on her fourth husband, she adopts 12 children of many colors and many origins, whom she calls “my rainbow tribe.”   At 45, she returns to the United States. She insists that everyone, whites and blacks, sit together at her shows. If not, she will not perform. At 57, she shares the stage with Martin Luther King and speaks against racial discrimination before an immense crowd at the March on Washington.   At 68, she recovers from a calamitous bankruptcy and at the Bobino Theater in Paris she celebrates a half-century on the stage.   And she departs.   Princeton, New Jersey, May 1947.   Photographer Philippe Halsman asks him: “Do you think there will be peace?”   And while the shutter clicks, Albert Einstein says, or rather mutters: “No.”   People believe that Einstein got the Nobel Prize for his theory of relativity, that he was the originator of the saying “Everything is relative,” and that he was the inventor of the atom bomb.   The truth is they did not give him a Nobel for his theory of relativity and he never uttered those words. Neither did he invent the bomb, although Hiroshima and Nagasaki would not have been possible if he had not discovered what he did.   He knew all too well that his findings, born of a celebration of life, had been used to annihilate it.   Father of the Computer   Alan Turing was sneered at for not being a tough guy, a he-man with hair on his chest.   He whined, croaked, stuttered. He used an old necktie for a belt. He rarely slept and went without shaving for days. And he raced from one end of the city to the other all the while concocting complicated mathematical formulas in his mind.   Working for British intelligence, he helped shorten the Second World War by inventing a machine that cracked the impenetrable military codes used by Germany’s high command.   At that point he had already dreamed up a prototype for an electronic computer and had laid out the theoretical foundations of today’s information systems. Later on, he led the team that built the first computer to operate with integrated programs. He played interminable chess games with it and asked it questions that drove it nuts. He insisted that it write him love letters. The machine responded by emitting messages that were rather incoherent.   But it was flesh-and-blood Manchester police who arrested him in 1952 for gross indecency.   At the trial, Turing pled guilty to being a homosexual.   To stay out of jail, he agreed to undergo medical treatment to cure him of the affliction. The bombardment of drugs left him impotent. He grew breasts. He stayed indoors, no longer went to the university. He heard whispers, felt stares drilling into his back.   He had the habit of eating an apple before going to bed.   One night, he injected the apple with cyanide.   Red Emperor   I was in China three years after the failure of the Great Leap Forward. No one talked about it. It was a state secret.   I saw Mao paying homage to Mao. In Tiananmen Square, the Gate of Heavenly Peace, Mao presided over an immense parade led by an immense statue of Mao. The plaster Mao held his hand high, and the flesh-and-blood Mao answered the greeting. From an ocean of flowers and colored balloons, the crowd cheered both.   Mao was China and China was his shrine. Mao exhorted all to follow the example set by Lei Feng and Lei Feng exhorted all to follow the example set by Mao. Lei Feng, a young Communist apostle of dubious existence, spent his days consoling the sick, helping widows, and giving his food away to orphans. His nights he spent reading the complete works of Mao. When he slept, he dreamed of Mao, his guide for every step. Lei Feng had no girlfriend or boyfriend because he did not waste time on frivolities, and it never occurred to him that life could be contradictory or reality diverse.   Fidel   His enemies say he was an uncrowned king who confused unity with unanimity.   And in that his enemies are right.   His enemies say that if Napoleon had a newspaper like Granma, no Frenchman would have learned of the disaster at Waterloo.   And in that his enemies are right.   His enemies say that he exercised power by talking a lot and listening little, because he was more used to hearing echoes than voices.   And in that his enemies are right.   But some things his enemies do not say: it was not to pose for the history books that he bared his breast to the invaders’ bullets,   he faced hurricanes as an equal, hurricane to hurricane,   he survived 637 attempts on his life,   his contagious energy was decisive in making a country out of a colony,   and it was not by Lucifer’s curse or God’s miracle that the new country managed to outlive 10 U.S. presidents, their napkins spread in their laps, ready to eat it with knife and fork.   And his enemies never mention that Cuba is one rare country that does not compete for the World Doormat Cup.   And they do not say that the revolution, punished for the crime of dignity, is what it managed to be and not what it wished to become. Nor do they say that the wall separating desire from reality grew ever higher and wider thanks to the imperial blockade, which suffocated a Cuban-style democracy, militarized society, and gave the bureaucracy, always ready with a problem for every solution, the alibis it needed to justify and perpetuate itself.   And they do not say that in spite of all the sorrow, in spite of the external aggression and the internal high-handedness, this distressed and obstinate island has spawned the least unjust society in Latin America.   And his enemies do not say that this feat was the outcome of the sacrifice of its people, and also of the stubborn will and old-fashioned sense of honor of the knight who always fought on the side of the losers, like his famous colleague in the fields of Castile.   Ali   He was butterfly and bee. In the ring, he floated and stung.   In 1967, Muhammad Ali, born Cassius Clay, refused to put on a uniform.   “Got nothing against no Viet Cong,” he said. “Ain’t no Vietnamese ever called me nigger.”   They called him a traitor. They sentenced him to a five-year jail term, and barred him from boxing. They stripped him of his title as champion of the world.   The punishment became his trophy. By taking away his crown, they anointed him king.   Years later, a few college students asked him to recite something. And for them he improvised the shortest poem in world literature: “Me, we.”   Walls   The Berlin Wall made the news every day. From morning till night we read, saw, heard: the Wall of Shame, the Wall of Infamy, the Iron Curtain…   In the end, a wall which deserved to fall fell. But other walls sprouted and continue sprouting across the world. Though they are much larger than the one in Berlin, we rarely hear of them.   Little is said about the wall the United States is building along the Mexican border, and less is said about the barbed-wire barriers surrounding the Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla on the African coast.   Practically nothing is said about the West Bank Wall, which perpetuates the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands and will be 15 times longer than the Berlin Wall. And nothing, nothing at all, is said about the Morocco Wall, which perpetuates the seizure of the Saharan homeland by the kingdom of Morocco, and is 60 times the length of the Berlin Wall.   Why are some walls so loud and others mute?   Barbie Goes to War   There are more than a billion Barbies. Only the Chinese outnumber them.   The most beloved woman on the planet would never let us down. In the war of good against evil, Barbie enlisted, saluted, and marched off to Iraq.   She arrived at the front wearing made-to-measure land, sea, and air uniforms reviewed and approved by the Pentagon.   Barbie is accustomed to changing professions, hairdos, and clothes. She has been a singer, an athlete, a paleontologist, an orthodontist, an astronaut, a firewoman, a ballerina, and who knows what else. Every new job entails a new look and a complete new wardrobe that every girl in the world is obliged to buy.   In February 2004, Barbie wanted to change boyfriends too. For nearly half a century she had been going steady with Ken, whose nose is the only protuberance on his body, when an Australian surfer seduced her and invited her to commit the sin of plastic.   Mattel, the manufacturer, announced an official separation.   It was a catastrophe. Sales plummeted. Barbie could change occupations and outfits, but she had no right to set a bad example.   Mattel announced an official reconciliation.   Lied-About Wars   Advertising campaigns, marketing schemes. The target is public opinion. Wars are sold the same way cars are, by lying.   In August 1964, President Lyndon Johnson accused the Vietnamese of attacking two U.S. warships in the Tonkin Gulf.   Then the president invaded Vietnam, sending planes and troops. He was acclaimed by journalists and by politicians, and his popularity skyrocketed. The Democrats in power and the Republicans out of power became a single party united against Communist aggression.   After the war had slaughtered Vietnamese in vast numbers, most of them women and children, Johnson’s secretary of defense, Robert McNamara, confessed that the Tonkin Gulf attack had never occurred.   The dead did not revive.   In March 2003, President George W. Bush accused Iraq of being on the verge of destroying the world with its weapons of mass destruction, “the most lethal weapons ever devised.”   Then the president invaded Iraq, sending planes and troops. He was acclaimed by journalists and by politicians, and his popularity skyrocketed. The Republicans in power and the Democrats out of power became a single party united against terrorist aggression.   After the war had slaughtered Iraqis in vast numbers, most of them women and children, Bush confessed that the weapons of mass destruction never existed. “The most lethal weapons ever devised” were his own speeches.   In the following elections, he won a second term.   In my childhood, my mother used to tell me that a lie has no feet. She was misinformed.   Riddle   They are the most important members of our family.   They are gluttons, devouring gas, oil, corn, sugarcane, and anything else that comes their way.   They own our time: bathing them, feeding and sheltering them, talking about them, and opening the way for them.   They reproduce faster than we do, and are 10 times as numerous as they were half a century ago.   They kill more people than do wars, but no one condemns the murders, least of all the newspapers and television channels that live off their advertisements.   They steal our streets. They steal our air. They laugh when they hear us say: “I drive.”   Lost and Found   The twentieth century, which was born proclaiming peace and justice, died bathed in blood. It passed on a world much more unjust than the one it inherited.   The twenty-first century, which also arrived heralding peace and justice, is following in its predecessor’s footsteps.   In my childhood, I was convinced that everything that went astray on earth ended up on the moon.   But the astronauts found no sign of dangerous dreams or broken promises or hopes betrayed.   If not on the moon, where might they be? Perhaps they were never misplaced.   Perhaps they are in hiding here on earth. Waiting.   (Editors’ note: This post is excerpted from Mirrors: Stories of Almost Everyone Copyright © 2009 by Eduardo Galeano. Published by Nation Books. Originally published in the Spanish language in 2008 by Siglo XXI Editores (Spain and Mexico) and Ediciones del Chanchito (Uruguay). By permission of Susan Bergholz Literary Services, New York City, and Lamy, NM. All rights reserved).   http://www.thenation.com/authors/eduardo-galeano http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/04/13/writer-eduardo-galeano-voice-latin-americas-left-dead-74 Visit the related web page
	View more stories