View previous stories
	The Future of Human Rights in ASEAN by Forum Asia, Solidarity for Asian People’s Advocacy   The ‘Future of Human Rights in ASEAN – Public Call for Independence and Protection Mandates‘ is the fifth report on the ASEAN Human Rights Mechanism since the establishment of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) in 2009 and the ASEAN Commission on the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Women and Children (ACWC) in 2010.   A series of consultations has been conducted as part of this review. Unfortunately, this has seemingly borne no fruit as there is a lack of available and relevant information nor is there any sign from ASEAN member states on what change and improvement this review will effect in empowering this regional human rights body.   This report provides a summary and assessment of general expectations arising from Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) and other stakeholders through their participation in this 2014 consultation. This report presents a number of recommendations for both AICHR and ACWC, as well as ASEAN itself.   We acknowledge that this report is by no means exhaustive. It is only able to capture in broad terms a full understanding of publicly available information on AICHR and ACWC. The report has gathered information from both CSO and stakeholder forums which have been actively engaged with both bodies.   This report has been prepared by the Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) and the Solidarity for Asian People’s Advocacy – Task Force on ASEAN and Human Rights (SAPA TFAHR).   * Download the (130 page) report via the link below: http://www.forum-asia.org/?p=19821 http://www.forum-asia.org/?p=19551 http://www.forum-asia.org/?p=19480 http://www.opendemocracy.net/openglobalrights/haris-azhar/making-asean-economic-community-human-rights-friendly   Nov. 2015   Asia and human rights: debunking the myths, a report from the International Federation for Human Rights (Fidh).   Human rights are the most powerful tool that can be used to denounce injustice and build better societies. In Asia, a number of leaders have cited so-called cultural particularities to deny the universality of human rights and justify repression, the abuse of power and systems of domination.   In a new report, entitled Demystifying Human Rights Protection in Asia, FIDH analyzes these claims and debunks the myths that surround the relation Asian countries have to human rights.   “This report shows that attempts to single out Asia on the basis of cultural relativism are an excuse to ignore human rights. So-called ’Asian values’ are instruments of power and domination that are deployed to legitimize attempts at preserving the political, social and economic status quo and to delegitimize dissenting voices”, said FIDH Secretary-General and Altsean-Burma Coordinator Debbie Stothard.   Through an analysis of national, regional and international perspectives for the protection of human rights in Asian countries, of their similarities and differences, as well as of advancements and limiting factors in these countries, this report shows the relevance of human rights as a tool to analyze Asian societies and to bring about social change.   “The report is very timely. It is a scathing response to those who promote the idea of a ’clash of civilizations’ or seek to compartmentalize the world’s regions, societies and cultures”, said FIDH President Karim Lahidji.   The reflections contained in this report are based on work done by FIDH and its Asian member organizations and on annual lectures given at the International Institute of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France. The report aims to shed light on the protection of human rights in Asia. It is published on the occasion of the third anniversary of the adoption of the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (an instrument that civil society deems unworthy of its name). Read the report Demystifying Human Rights Protection in Asia.   http://www.fidh.org/en/region/asia/asia-and-human-rights-debunking-the-myths Visit the related web page
	Covering courts in China is perilous, but the rule of law is the only option for a better future by Luo Jieqi Nieman Foundation at Harvard China   As a legal reporter in China for the past six years, I have spent a lot of time in courthouses. Judges almost always bar reporters from sitting in courtrooms and policemen frequently shoo us away from the building. So I often hid in the bathroom, waiting for potential sources. If I was found out, at least I had a plausible excuse for being there.   In 2010, a policeman pulled me out of the restroom in a Beijing courthouse. I was there to cover a trial involving the state-owned China Central Television (CCTV) and an illegal fireworks display the year before that ignited a major fire, killing one firefighter and injuring eight people. More than 20 people, including some low-level CCTV employees, were charged in connection with the disaster.   Many journalists questioned whether the trial was fair. Reporters were barred from attending the trial or even using the bathroom next to the courtroom. I was able to interview some of the lawyers for the defendants who gave me the case materials. My article was headlined “Questioning the CCTV Fire.”   When I could not hide in the bathroom, sometimes I sat in the courthouse corridor. If no policeman was watching, I would kneel and listen at the door. One day, when I was listening like that, someone watching the security cameras used to monitor what goes on in the courthouse noticed what I was doing. The leader of the press office suddenly approached me, with a young judge and a few policemen in tow. One of the policemen threatened to pull me outside. The young judge said, “No, don’t touch her. Let her leave on her own.”   I was moved by his kindness and wanted to thank him. But I just kept walking and dared not look at him. I was afraid I could not hold back my tears if I faced him. A few days later I tried to find the young judge to express my gratitude. But I never saw him again.   However, I have continued to feel grateful that he spoke up for me. After that incident, the courthouse staff knew that I was the reporter who would listen at the door. One day, I again was sitting in the corridor of the Beijing No. 2 Intermediate Court, trying to listen to a trial involving Zeyuan Li, a former military official. He had spent time in prison for fraud, smuggling, and other crimes. When he was released, he somehow raised about $330 million and bought the majority share of the state-owned Shenzhen Airlines, trading on his ties to the authorities. Four years later, he was arrested for embezzlement.   When I was in the corridor trying to listen to the trial, a young woman from the press office, her finger pointing at me, approached with her boss. She said, “That woman in blue is a reporter.” I answered, “Yes, I am a reporter. Please put down your finger. That is disrespectful to me.” After the leader left, the young woman sat near me, to keep me from listening at the door. When the session adjourned, I found a source who helped me gain access to thousands of pages of court documents.   I wrote an exclusive story, telling the truth about the hegemony of business relationships in China. Some businessmen cooperate with politicians, getting many privileges. These secret deals are difficult for the press to discover.   Sometimes I got lucky and was able, with the help of a source, to enter the hearing room. However, I had to pretend I was not a reporter so I could not take any notes. In 2013, I went to Shandong province to cover a bank fraud case. All press were barred from the hearing room.   With the help of the defendant’s families, I pretended to be one of them. Before I entered the hearing room, I went to the restroom and put a tape recorder inside my bra. The hearings often lasted a few hours and I would eventually feel the heat of the battery on my chest. My heart would beat faster and faster.   One day, two policemen were sitting beside me. I was nervous but I tried to hide it. Before the hearing started, I stood up to get some water. My hands were shaking. When the hearing finished, I rushed out of the court. I called my editor and shouted, “I hate it. I hate coming to the court. Sooner or later, I will die of a heart attack.”   Yet I could not stop. No matter how angry or upset I got, I continued being a legal reporter because I am proud of what I do. Legal affairs is not just a beat. I am working for human rights and for the freedom of the Chinese people. I believe that the rule of law is China’s only option for a better future.   In recent years, more and more disappointed Chinese people have emigrated to other countries. But most of the people don’t want to or are not able to emigrate. I am one of them. Those of us who stay in our own country are determined to make it better for ourselves and for our children.   * Luo Jieqi is a senior legal reporter for China’s Caixin Media Group. She previously worked as legal reporter at Caijing Magazine, and in 2011 was recognized as Caixin.com’s most-read reporter. Visit the related web page
	View more stories