View previous stories
	Record heatwaves, floods, droughts a stark vision of the world for future generations by Ted Chaiban UNICEF Director of Programmes   Aug. 2018   The large number of extreme weather events around the world, including floods in southern India, wildfires in the western United States and heatwaves across much of the northern hemisphere, are putting children in immediate danger, as well as jeopardizing their futures, UNICEF warned today.   'In any crisis, children are among the most vulnerable, and the extreme weather events we are seeing around the world are no exception', said Ted Chaiban, UNICEF Director of Programmes. 'Over the past few months, we have seen a stark vision of the world we are creating for future generations. As more extreme weather events increase the number of emergencies and humanitarian crises, it is children who will pay the highest price', he added.   June and July saw record high temperatures set across much of the northern hemisphere, with the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) reporting the first six months of the year have made it the hottest La Nina year on record.   From North America to East Asia, and from the Arctic Circle to Europe, large parts of the globe have experienced heatwaves, droughts, wildfires, floods, and landslides resulting in injury and loss of life, environmental damage and widespread loss to livelihoods including harvest losses. Countries in Central America and the Caribbean are preparing for the peak of the hurricane season while still trying to recover from the devastating 2017 season, which was the costliest on record.   While individual weather events cannot specifically be attributed to climate change, the increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather -- including recent high temperatures, intense rains and slow-moving weather fronts -- are in line with predictions of how human activities are affecting the global climate.   Such events can cause death and devastation, and can also contribute to the increased spread of major killers of children, such as malnutrition, malaria and diarrhoea. And as these extreme climate events increase in frequency and magnitude, the risks to children will likely outpace global capacity to mitigate them as well as to provide humanitarian response.   'As the world experiences a steady rise in climate-driven extreme weather events, it is children's lives and futures that will be the most disrupted', added Chaiban. 'Therefore, it's vital that Governments and the international community take concrete steps to safeguard children's future and their rights. The worst impacts of climate change are not inevitable, but the time for action is now'.   Numerous studies have documented that human-induced climate change has increased the frequency and severity of heatwaves across the globe. Children are especially at risk as they adjust more slowly than adults to changes in environmental heat, and are more susceptible to heat-related health risks, with children under 12 months old particularly vulnerable.   Infants and small children are more likely to die or suffer from heatstroke because they are unable to regulate their body temperature and control their surrounding environment. Extreme heat conditions also increase the need for safe and reliable drinking water, while in many cases rendering such water more scarce through evaporation.   Floods threaten children's survival and development, with direct impacts including injuries and death by drowning. Beyond these immediate risks, floods compromise safe water supplies and damage sanitation facilities, increasing the risk of diarrhoea and other disease outbreaks, as well as impacting children's access to education.   Damage to housing endangers children's well-being, particularly if emergency shelter is either scarce or inadequate. It also destroys infrastructure, making it difficult to move lifesaving assistance where needed.   Droughts have multiple effects on poor families and communities. Crops fail, livestock die and income drops, leading to food insecurity for the poor as well as rising food prices globally. Water becomes scarce and the lack of food and water, as well as inequitable access to these necessities, can result in migration and social disorder, with children among the most vulnerable to the consequences of these effects.   UNICEF's agenda for action on climate change include:   Strengthening health systems to respond to a changing climate and more frequent extreme weather events, including the scaling-up of information platforms to track the increased range of disease vectors, increased deployment of vaccines and an emphasis on disaster resilient construction. By strengthening the ability to provide health services to children in the aftermath of extreme weather events, we lessen longer-term impacts.   Increasing the ability of educational services to be delivered in the aftermath of extreme weather events including through the use of disaster-resilient construction and the use of decentralized renewable energy.   Increasing investment in and delivery of climate resilient agricultural, water and sanitation services. This includes a greater focus on understanding changing crop and water availability patterns as a result of climate events, providing access to financial mechanisms such as disaster risk insurance for farmers, and the use of decentralized low-carbon water supply and treatment options.   Putting in place measures to protect children who have been displaced, migrate or are refugees as a result of climate change or climate-related impacts.   Providing children and youth with climate change education and training to take advantage of the opportunities in climate and environmental response including renewable energy, early warning systems and the circular economy.   Aligning and coordinating work on climate change adaptation, preparedness and disaster risk reduction. Planning and policies on climate change preparedness, response, and recovery must consider the full spectrum of children's needs before, during, and after severe climate events.   Advocating for the rights and vulnerabilities of children to be reflected in national strategies, commitments and action plans including Intended Nationally Determined Contributions and National Adaptation /Mitigation Plans.   Increasing understanding of the links between climate change and impacts on children; both the short term physiological and developmental effects and longer-term economic and intergenerational impacts. Responding to climate change is not only a moral imperative but makes economic sense.   Deepen the evidence base on the links not only between climate action and global weather events but also between a low-carbon economy and the potential for employment generation, local air pollution and national energy security. Responding to climate change makes sense from the perspectives of national security, domestic economy, and the health of children.   * The impact of climate change on children: http://uni.cf/2l9h8Gr Visit the related web page
	Secret courts enable a government to try to prosecute people for revealing its crimes by Blueprint for Free Speech, agencies   This is a story about spies, international espionage, betrayal and billions of dollars’ worth of contested natural resources lying under the ocean floor.   In this story, one of the richest countries in the Asia-Pacific region spied on and betrayed one of the very poorest. The beneficiary of the Australian state-sanctioned spying operation was an oil and gas company.   The story traverses five countries – The Netherlands, Indonesia, Australia, the UK, and one of the world’s newest nations, Timor-Leste, formerly known as East Timor.   The history of bravery and betrayal   The story begins with Timor Leste’s transition from Indonesian rule into an independent nation in 2002. This was a violent transition, in which ‘more than 150,000 people, a quarter of the population, were murdered or deliberately starved to death between 1974 and 1999, when the territory was under Indonesian rule.’   Australia and Timor share a long history together, with Timor having proved itself as a staunch ally to its bigger, wealthier neighbour.   In the First World War, a company of Allied soldiers, including Australian, Dutch and British fighters, were trapped in Timor, and came under heavy fire after disrupting the Japanese military presence. The Allies retreated into the mountains and were hid and protected by the Timorese, at a terrible cost to themselves. The East Timorese suffered 40,000 deaths due to aerial bombings and the destruction of villages that the Japanese forces suspected of sheltering Australian troops.   Timor is one of the poorest nations in South-East Asia, ranking 131st out of 182 countries on the UN’s 2018 Human Development Index.   By comparison Timor’s neighbour Australia is wealthy. The flight from from Dili, the capital of Timor, to Darwin, Australia’s northern-most capital city, 722kms (449 miles) away, only takes about an hour, and yet it is a world away in terms of child malnutrition and poverty.   So when Timor gained its independence, it was not surprising that Australia offered to send international aid support to the new nation. But it also sent spies.   Timor only has one major source of wealth: natural resources that include valuable oil and gas fields. These are under the ocean bed in the Timor Sea that divides Australia and Timor. In order to develop those resources, the two allies were obliged to share the revenue. How the two countries would divide the undersea resources was the subject of treaty negotiations on their maritime boundaries.   The Australian Government sought to gain an unfair advantage in these negotiations by sending Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) agents to bug the offices of the Timorese prime minister and his cabinet. The Australians would have heard the Timorese negotiating positions. One of the key protagonists in this story is Witness K, an unnamed ASIS officer who was asked to lead the bugging operation.   The spying operation was technologically sophisticated:   The electronic bugs placed inside the Palácio do Governo “were turned on and off by a covert agent inside the building. They then beamed the recording by microwave signal to a line-of-sight covert listening base set up inside the Central Maritime Hotel ... The digital recordings were then allegedly couriered across town to the Australian embassy, and sent to Canberra for analysis.”   “The 127-room Central Maritime Hotel was a converted Russian hospital ship that was rebuilt in Finland, used as a hotel in Myanmar and then towed to Dili because there were no hotels or restaurants of suitable standard for international visitors. It was conveniently moored opposite the waterfront white-stuccoed Palacio do Governo.”   The Timorese didn’t know their private cabinet discussions about the treaty had been secretly breached. The Australian Government’s cover story for the bugging was an aid program to renovate the Timor government offices.   In 2006, foreign ministers Alexander Downer of Australia and Jose Ramos-Horta of Timor signed an agreement to divide up the resources under the Timor Sea. Australia was the clear winner in those negotiations, gaining a significant financial advantage compared to what would have been the standard position under international law.   A major beneficiary of the new bilateral agreement was a resources company, Woodside Petroleum. In 2008, Foreign Secretary Downer left politics to take up a lucrative contract with Woodside. The then Secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade had already resigned and joined the board of Woodside.   The bugging operation did not sit well with some inside ASIS, Australia’s overseas intelligence agency. The situation was described by Australian Senator Rex Patrick in a 2018 speech in Parliament:   ‘Aware of Mr Downer's consultancy work for Woodside, Witness K complained to the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security about the East Timor operation. ASIS took steps to effectively terminate his employment—an outcome that is not unusual for whistleblowers in this country. In response, Witness K obtained permission from the IGIS to speak to an ASIS-approved lawyer, Bernard Collaery, a former ACT Attorney-General. After 2½ years of research, Mr Collaery determined that the espionage operation in East Timor was unlawful and may also have been an offence under section 334 of the Criminal Code of the ACT.   ‘Going to the specifics, the case rested on the fact that the then director of ASIS, David Irvine, ordered Witness K, the head of all technical operations for ASIS, to place covert listening devices in the East Timorese government buildings. Those instructions enlivened the section 334 offence in that it constituted a conspiracy to defraud Australia's joint venture partner, East Timor, by gaining advantage through improper methods when the Commonwealth was under a legal obligation to conduct good-faith negotiations.’   In 2012, Timor’s leadership became aware of the spying, and started proceedings in the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague. Timor intended to argue that Australia had acted in bad faith by spying during the negotiations, which would void the Timor Sea agreement.   Witness K was to be the star witness, supported by his lawyer, Bernard Collaery. Collaery had flown to The Netherlands early to prepare for the hearing in December 2013. The Hague had a special significance to him because his father, a WWII fighter pilot had been shot down and killed on an Allied mission near The Hague. Collaery had located the spot the plane went down in waters just offshore.   While Collaery was abroad, Australia’s domestic spy agency ASIO and the federal police simultaneously raided Collaery’s home and barristers’ chambers, as well as the home of Witness K. They took K’s passport, so he would not be able to travel anywhere. The raids had been organised by David Irvine, who had then become head of ASIO.   Collaery would not go quietly. Witness K would not be able to identify himself, but Collaery provided a voice to call out the campaign of persecution and harassment being conducted against them both. He fearlessly spoke up about the raid.   If the raid on the former intelligence officer and his lawyer was meant to dampen down Timor’s agitation for a revised treaty, it failed.   By 2018, the Australian Government had been shamed into renegotiating the treaty. This time around, Timor won a much fairer deal with an appropriately larger share of the sea bed and its resources.   In this way, the people of Timor Lest have finally won rightful ownership over their own natural resources. The increased revenue will have a significant impact in a country where the population suffers in so much poverty.   The story is not however over for Witness K and Bernard Collaery. In 2018, four months after the signing of the new treaty, and four and a half years after the raids, the Australian Government chose to charge Witness K and his lawyer, Bernard Collaery.   Each faces criminal charges for conspiring to share information protected by Section 39 of the Intelligence Services Act, which prohibits the unauthorised communication of official information.   Witness K has indicated he will plead guilty to breaching the Intelligence Services Act. Bernard Collaery is continuing to fight in the ACT (Australian Capital Territory) Supreme Court in Canberra.   Proceedings have been opaque and expensive. The Australian Government has already spent some $2 million AUD prosecuting Collaery and Witness K, despite the proceedings being still only in a pre-trial stage. That Collaery faces four charges only came to the public after nine months of hearings and seven judgments.   The Australian Government has insisted that Collaery’s court proceedings be held in secret. While some secrecy, such as protecting Witness K’s identity, is important, there is a great deal about this case that can and should be heard in open court.   The Law Council of Australia, the nation’s peak legal body, has thrown its support behind Collaery and criticised the government’s use of secret courts.   The president of the Council said that the use of the 2004 National Security Information Act, which was enacted during the war on terror in response to terrorist threats, to close the court room, offends ‘the principles of open justice’. Justice being served openly is a “basic rule of the common law”, she said.   Open courts are a cornerstone of Australia’s legal system. One of the major risks with secret courts is that a government will try to prosecute people for revealing its crimes, and those crimes will never come to light.   In Timor-Leste, according to Kim McGrath’s book, Crossing the Line: Australia’s Secret History in the Timor Sea, ‘the streets of Dili are graffitied with kangaroos carrying away buckets of oil.’   Congratulations to Bernard Collaery, the winner of the 2020 Blueprint International Whistleblowing Prize.   http://www.blueprintforfreespeech.net/en/prize/recipients/2020/bernard-collaery http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/jul/08/jose-ramos-horta-pleased-fairness-prevailed-in-bernard-collaery-case http://bit.ly/3yvbrWJ http://www.hrlc.org.au/explainer-the-unjust-prosecution-of-bernard-collaery/ http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/feb/02/cabinet-documents-reveal-australias-interest-in-oil-and-gas-before-timor-leste-bugging http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/oct/08/prosecution-of-bernard-collaery-an-insult-to-timor-leste-xanana-gusmao-says http://www.hrlc.org.au/news/2021/7/21/charities-lodge-urgent-request-for-un-intervention-to-prevent-attack-on-advocacy Visit the related web page
	View more stories